Մուտք


Մենք հանդիսանում ենք կապող օղակ հեղինակների և պատվիրատուների միջև:

Մեր կայքում դուք կարող եք պատվիրել նյութեր՝ ուղղիղ կապ հաստատելով մասնագետներից ցանկացածի հետ:
    The sentence as the basic unit of language

    Կուրսային | Անգլերեն

    The sentence as the basic unit of language

    Էջերի քանակ: 50

    Կոդ: #13598

    10000 դր.




    Բովանդակություն
    Օգտագործված գրականության ցանկ

    Bibliography

    1.      Archer, D. and Culpeper, J. (forthcoming) ‘Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics’. In Wilson, A., Rayson, P. and Mc Enery, A. M. (eds.) Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech. Peter Lang: Frankfurt/Main.

    2.      Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1978, 1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    3.      Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960) ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’.  In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) (1969) Style in Language. New York: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, 253-276.

    4.      Brinton, L. J. (1996) Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    5.      Buzatov V. V., Essentials of conversational English syntax. Moscow 1998

    6.      Culpeper, J. (1996) ‘Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness’.  Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3): 349- 367.

    7.      Culpeper, J. and Kytö, M. (1997) ‘Towards a Corpus of Dialogues, 1550-1750’.  In Ramisch, H. and Wynne, K. (eds.) Language in Time and Space: Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag Stuttgart, 60-73.

    8.      Leech, G. (1999) ‘The Distribution and Function of Vocatives in American and British English Conversation’. In Hasselgård, H. and Oksefjell, S. (eds.) Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 107-118.

    9.      Milroy, L. (1980, 1987) Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    10.   Paronyan Sh. On the Linguistic of University through Hesitation Markers in Conflit Talk in English, X. 2009, p. 92-98

    11.   Quirk, R. et al., (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.

    12.   Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1994) ‘Historical Sociolinguistics’.  In Nevalainen, T. and RaumolinBrunberg, H. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 11-37.

    13.   Salmon, V. (1979) The Study of Language in 17th Century England, Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

    14.   Shiina, M. (2002) Vocatives in Early Modern English Comedies: Vocatives as Pragmatic Markers. A paper presented at the 12th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics. 21st-26th August 2002, Glasgow.

    15.   Shiina, M. (forthcoming) Vocatives in Early Modern English Comedies: A Corpus-Based Approach. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Lancaster University.

    16.   Spove, S. H. (1979) A Critical Old-Spelling Edition of Richard Brome’s A Mad Couple Well Match’d.  New York and London: Garland Publishing.

    17.   Traugott, E. C. (1989) ‘On the Rise of Epistemic Meaning in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change’. Language 65 (1): 31-55.

    18.   Traugott, E. C. (forthcoming) ‘From Etymology to Historical Pragmatics’.  In Minkova, D. and

    19.   Stockwell, R. (eds.) Studies in the History of the English Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    20.   Traugott, E. C. (forthcoming) ‘Historical Pragmatics’.  In Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    21.   Wales, K. (1983) ‘Thou and You in Early Modern English: Brown and Gilman Re-Appraised’. Studia Lingustica 37 (2): 107-125.

    22.   Watts, R. J. (1992) ‘Linguistic Politeness and Politic Verbal Behaviour: Reconsidering Claims for Universality’.  In Watts, R. J.  et al (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 43-70.

    CONTENTS

    Introduction

    CHAPTER 1. The Classification of Utterances.

    1. The Basic Units of language

    1.2. The sentence as the basic unit of language

    Verbless imperative sentences

    Imperative sentences

    Conversation,dialogue.Response.reaction.

    Vocative Utterances and their responses

    2.2. Responses to vocative sentences

    Conclusion

    Bibliography

    Եթե կայքում տեղադրված ինֆորմացիյան բավարար չէ հասկանալու համար նյութի պարունակությունը ուղարկեք հարցում և մեր մասնագետները կարճ ժամանակում կուղարկեն Ձեզ անրաժեշտ ինֆորմացիյան:
    Ուղարկել հարցում

    Եթե այս նյութը այն չէ ինչ դուք փնտրում էիք, ապա դուք կարող եք այն պատվիրել www.referat.am կայքում գրանցված մասնագետներից ցանկացածին շատ մատչելի և հուսալի (ողղիղ կապ մասնագետի հետ) եղանակներով:
    Պատվիրել նյութ

    Գնել նյութը


    Լրացրեք բոլոր դաշտերը
    Ձեր պատվերը հաջողությամբ ընդունված է: Մեր մասնագետները կարճ ժամանակ հետո կապ կհաստատեն Ձեզ հետ:

    referat.am kursayinner referatner diplomayinner tezer պատվիրել աշխատանքներ description_1

    Bibliography

    1.      Archer, D. and Culpeper, J. (forthcoming) ‘Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics’. In Wilson, A., Rayson, P. and Mc Enery, A. M. (eds.) Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech. Peter Lang: Frankfurt/Main.

    2.      Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1978, 1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    3.      Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960) ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’.  In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) (1969) Style in Language. New York: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, 253-276.

    4.      Brinton, L. J. (1996) Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    5.      Buzatov V. V., Essentials of conversational English syntax. Moscow 1998

    6.      Culpeper, J. (1996) ‘Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness’.  Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3): 349- 367.

    7.      Culpeper, J. and Kytö, M. (1997) ‘Towards a Corpus of Dialogues, 1550-1750’.  In Ramisch, H. and Wynne, K. (eds.) Language in Time and Space: Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag Stuttgart, 60-73.

    8.      Leech, G. (1999) ‘The Distribution and Function of Vocatives in American and British English Conversation’. In Hasselgård, H. and Oksefjell, S. (eds.) Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 107-118.

    9.      Milroy, L. (1980, 1987) Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    10.   Paronyan Sh. On the Linguistic of University through Hesitation Markers in Conflit Talk in English, X. 2009, p. 92-98

    11.   Quirk, R. et al., (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.

    12.   Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1994) ‘Historical Sociolinguistics’.  In Nevalainen, T. and RaumolinBrunberg, H. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 11-37.

    13.   Salmon, V. (1979) The Study of Language in 17th Century England, Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

    14.   Shiina, M. (2002) Vocatives in Early Modern English Comedies: Vocatives as Pragmatic Markers. A paper presented at the 12th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics. 21st-26th August 2002, Glasgow.

    15.   Shiina, M. (forthcoming) Vocatives in Early Modern English Comedies: A Corpus-Based Approach. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Lancaster University.

    16.   Spove, S. H. (1979) A Critical Old-Spelling Edition of Richard Brome’s A Mad Couple Well Match’d.  New York and London: Garland Publishing.

    17.   Traugott, E. C. (1989) ‘On the Rise of Epistemic Meaning in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change’. Language 65 (1): 31-55.

    18.   Traugott, E. C. (forthcoming) ‘From Etymology to Historical Pragmatics’.  In Minkova, D. and

    19.   Stockwell, R. (eds.) Studies in the History of the English Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    20.   Traugott, E. C. (forthcoming) ‘Historical Pragmatics’.  In Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    21.   Wales, K. (1983) ‘Thou and You in Early Modern English: Brown and Gilman Re-Appraised’. Studia Lingustica 37 (2): 107-125.

    22.   Watts, R. J. (1992) ‘Linguistic Politeness and Politic Verbal Behaviour: Reconsidering Claims for Universality’.  In Watts, R. J.  et al (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 43-70.

    description_2

    CONTENTS

    Introduction

    CHAPTER 1. The Classification of Utterances.

    1. The Basic Units of language

    1.2. The sentence as the basic unit of language

    Verbless imperative sentences

    Imperative sentences

    Conversation,dialogue.Response.reaction.

    Vocative Utterances and their responses

    2.2. Responses to vocative sentences

    Conclusion

    Bibliography

    title_arm The sentence as the basic unit of language title_eng convertot_1 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_2 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_3 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_4 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_5 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_6 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_7 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_8 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_9 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_10 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_11 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_13 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_14 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_15 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_16 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_17 The sentence as the basic unit of language convertot_18 The sentence as the basic unit of language